Aug 2017
Picture this: You’ve just launched the next big app, user numbers are soaring, and champagne corks are popping. In this glorious moment, the last thing you want is an unexpected cloud bill.
Whether you’re scaling a promising app or managing enterprise-level digital products, understanding cloud options and costs can mean the difference between a lean, mean digital machine and a budget that slows your innovation. Here’s a breakdown of the options, the costs, and our recommendations for optimizing cloud spend.
A common question is: “Isn’t a virtual server just software with no physical hardware?” While virtual servers are software-defined, they leverage real hardware behind the scenes. Virtualization technology allows this server to be carved into multiple slices (virtual servers). You can rent a slice (your virtual server) from a cloud provider who manages the entire server (the whole pizza).
The cost of your IaaS virtual server depends on several factors:
By understanding these factors, you can optimize your IaaS virtual server for both performance and cost-effectiveness.
Let’s say you need a basic virtual server in a US region running a Linux OS to serve a website with moderate traffic (around 1 million monthly visits). Using on-demand pricing (per-second billing) with a mid-tier instance type, the cost could be around $1-$2 per hour. However, if you utilize reserved instances and choose a less congested region, you could potentially bring that cost down to $0.50-$1.00 per hour.
Serverless computing has emerged as a game-changer for digital products. It offers a way to build and scale applications without the overhead of managing server infrastructure. This model promises pay-per-use efficiency, potentially revolutionizing how we develop and deploy digital products.
Imagine this: your digital product only incurs costs for the exact milliseconds its code executes. Sounds ideal, right? In many cases, it is. You may be able to significantly reduce cloud costs and improve product agility by migrating specific functions to serverless architectures.
However, there are some things to consider:
In a serverless model, your digital product’s logic runs in an environment that abstracts away infrastructure concerns. The cloud provider manages the underlying servers, allowing you to focus solely on your product’s unique value proposition.
With serverless, your digital product incurs costs based on actual usage, not pre-allocated resources. This can be particularly beneficial for products with unpredictable or sporadic usage patterns.
Consider a digital product feature like image processing for a social media app. If this feature processes 1 million images a month, each taking 1 second and using minimal data transfer, the serverless cost could be around $11 using Google Cloud Platform pricing. This cost scales linearly with usage, providing predictable pricing as your product grows.
By leveraging serverless architecture, your digital product can achieve greater agility, potentially lower costs, and seamless scalability, allowing you to focus on innovation and user experience rather than infrastructure management.
As we navigate the cloud landscape, it’s crucial not to overlook Platform as a Service (PaaS) offerings. For many digital product leaders, PaaS can be a game-changer, striking a balance between the control of Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) and the simplicity of Software as a Service (SaaS).
Estimating PaaS costs can be trickier due to the varied pricing models. However, for a basic web application with moderate traffic, costs could range from $10 to $100 per month, depending on the chosen platform and features.
Hybrid cloud combines on-premises infrastructure with public cloud resources. This approach offers flexibility and control for sensitive data or workloads with fluctuating resource needs.
Hybrid cloud costs are highly variable depending on the specific configuration. However, for an accurate picture, it’s essential to factor in both on-premises infrastructure costs and public cloud resource usage.
Remember: Actual costs will vary depending on your specific code, usage patterns, and chosen cloud provider.
Here’s the truth: there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. The right choice depends on your product’s unique needs, usage patterns, and growth trajectory.
For instance, if you’re running a digital enterprise with steady, predictable workloads, traditional virtual servers with reserved instances might offer the best bang for your buck. Conversely, serverless could provide the flexibility and cost-efficiency you need to scale rapidly if you’re a startup with variable traffic or running a mobile app backend.
The key is understanding the technology and how it aligns with your business goals. Are you optimizing for rapid scaling? Predictable costs? Global reach? Each priority might lead you down a different path.
As cloud experts, we’ve seen digital leaders stumble into some common traps. Here are the top pitfalls to watch out for:
By being aware of these pitfalls, you’re already a step ahead in your cloud cost optimization journey.
As a digital leader, you know that your product’s needs evolve as you grow. So should your cloud strategy. Let’s walk through how cloud costs shift as you scale and how to stay ahead of the curve.
In the early days, every dollar counts. You need flexibility to pivot, experiment, and find your product-market fit without breaking the bank. This is where cloud computing truly shines for startups.
Serverless architectures often make sense at this stage. They allow you to build and scale quickly without upfront infrastructure costs. Plus, you’re only paying for what you use, which is crucial when user numbers are unpredictable.
Pro tip: Don’t overlook the free tiers and startup credits major cloud providers offer. We’ve seen startups run lean for months using these resources strategically. But beware of the cliff at the end of these programs—carefully plan your transition to paid services.
As you hit your stride and user numbers climb, you’ll face new challenges. Suddenly, that serverless architecture might not be as cost-effective as it once was. This is where hybrid approaches often come into play.
The key here is monitoring and flexibility. Set up robust monitoring systems to understand your usage patterns. Be ready to adjust your architecture as needs change. And start thinking about long-term commitments like reserved instances, which can offer significant savings for more predictable workloads.
At the enterprise level, cloud costs become a major line item, and sophisticated strategies are needed to address them.
Multi-cloud and hybrid approaches often make sense at this scale. They allow you to leverage the strengths of different providers and negotiate better rates. But they also introduce complexity. Strong governance and FinOps practices become crucial.
FinOps leverages a set of core principles and practices to achieve these goals. Here are some examples:
As cloud architectures have evolved, so have the tools to manage them. In 2024, AI-driven cost optimization tools are game-changers. They can predict spending trends, suggest optimizations, and even automatically adjust resources based on usage patterns.
But tools are only as good as the strategies behind them. Here are a few best practices we’ve seen drive real results:
Remember, the best tool aligns with your product’s specific architecture and cloud environment. At InspiringApps, we can help you choose and implement the right tools for your unique digital product.
Here are answers to some common questions we receive about managing cloud costs for digital products:
A: Choosing the right cloud provider becomes crucial as you scale your digital product. Let’s compare the major players:
Remember, your choice should align with your product’s specific needs. Consider factors like:
At InspiringApps, we’ve helped digital product leaders navigate this decision for various types of applications. The right choice can significantly impact both your product’s performance and your bottom line.
A: Use cloud provider calculators and analyze current usage patterns. We can help create a custom scaling model for your product.
A: It depends on your specific needs. Multi-cloud can provide redundancy and cost benefits but also adds complexity. We can assess if it’s right for your product.
A: Mobile apps often have lower server-side costs but higher data transfer costs. Web apps might have higher compute costs but more predictable scaling.
A: Serverless can be cost-effective for products with variable traffic but may not be suitable for all use cases. We can evaluate if it’s a good fit for your product.
A: We recommend a thorough review quarterly, with ongoing monitoring. Major product updates or feature releases should also trigger a review.
As we look to the future, a few trends are clear. Edge computing is becoming more prominent, especially for IoT and real-time applications. This will introduce new cost considerations around data transfer and local processing.
Sustainability is also increasingly important. Cloud providers are offering more tools to measure and reduce the carbon footprint of your digital products. In some markets, this is becoming a differentiator for environmentally conscious users.
In 2024, your approach to cloud costs isn’t just an IT decision—it’s a core part of your business strategy. The right approach can give you the agility to innovate rapidly, the efficiency to compete effectively, and the scalability to grow confidently.
At InspiringApps, we’ve guided countless digital leaders through this complex landscape. Whether you’re launching a new product or optimizing an enterprise-scale application, we’re here to help you navigate the clouds and keep your costs grounded.
InspiringApps: A Business Perspective on Building Mobile Apps was written to help you evaluate ideas and turn the best ones into a genuinely successful app for use within your company or for consumer sale.
Get the eBook
